by Jorzilla » Mon Mar 17, 2014 1:34 pm
Inb4 Le-Biogoji jokes, in terms of Godzilla designs, purely on aesthetics. I'd rank it as follows:
Bio-Goji
Mosu-Goji
Shodai-Goji
Soshingeki-Goji
84-Goji
Kiryu-Goji
Sokogeki-Goji
King-Goji
Legendary-Goji
Moge-Goji
Final-Goji
Mire-Goji
Rado-Goji
Bato-Goji
Daisenso-Goji
Gyakushu-Goji
Musuko-Goji
I'll want to see how it looks on screen first, because some designs look cooler than they are executed (Soshingeki-Goji). However I am very neutral/negative towards the overall design, and simply being new and different is not enough for me to like it.
As for why I care so much about things like gills or stubby feet? Well this current design will influence audience expectations of what future Godzilla's should look like pretty substantially. It was a hard fight on more mainstream forums or real life discussions that I'd have convincing people that a traditional humanoid shape for Godzilla was the right move over the sleek design for Zilla. While my side won out on that end, now there's a different president for features that I don't like myself, specifically the possibility that not only does Godzilla spines light up, his neck gills act as a pressure release and glow themselves, or that his feet look like elephant trunks with spikes jammed in the end.
A good example of this was G2K design. Personally I was never a fan of the in organic jagged spikes. I didn't think it looked fitting for a monster which usually looks organic: the new styled spikes looked very inorganic. GMK comes out and we have probably one of my favorite styles of organic looking, maple-leaf like spines on any Godzilla....probably one of my favorite things about the design actually. Kiryu-Goji comes out, and while they toned down the spines and made them a traditional color, they are still jagged looking. I still thinkg they are kind of odd looking, especially given that within the universe of that movie Godzilla had a traditional design, and that was used for MG. (It always bugged me on how no one commented on how different the Godzilla's looked compared to one another within the context of the film). My point is that Kiryu-Goji legitimized what was a radical design element of Mire-Goji. Looking through criticism of Legendary-Goji, I've seen multiple people call out the angular spines as something that they specifically don't like, or at least preferred maple leaf spines. This is an element that traces itself to Mire-Gojia and Kiryu-Goji!
So yes, I'm prepared for another three pages of Bio-Goji puns, that's fine. But when I criticize things I don't like about this design and I'm met with arguments like "well just watch Godzilla vs. King Ghidorah or Biollante, or Mothra, etc. again if you like that design," just know that what I'm actually getting at is my distaste for how these elements will influence future Godzilla designs. I think, and hope the new movie is popular, but when it's a hit (because I think it will be), we will probably have three films setting Western Audience expectations of 'this is what Godzilla is supposed to look like,' when in fact I don't think that's the case. It will undoubtedly influence future Godzilla designs, even Japanese ones if Toho ever gets around to making another traditional Godzilla movie. So the next time someone says, "It's not Bio-Goji" the surface of their statement might be aggravating to a lot of people on this forum, but the sub-text is: "I wish they had gone with something less radical."