by jellydonut25 » Fri Jan 10, 2014 1:53 am
Carrie - This pretty much sucks.
For starters, the ONLY reason to do a Carrie remake is to make a more faithful adaptation of the book, but for some reason the ONLY thing people seem to remember/think of when they think about the biggest differences between De Palma's film and the book is the ending.
IMHO, if you're going to make an entire film for five minutes of differences, AND NOT EVEN GET THAT RIGHT, then why remake the movie at all?
This movie brings SO LITTLE new to the table, it's really disappointing. I mean, yeah, it amps up the insanity of the end, but other than that and making the Billy character more evil, more free-willed, and less of a goofball, the movie plays out so stunningly the same, it really honestly feels like one of the very most pointless remakes I've ever seen.
Oh and Chloe Grace Moretz is WOEFULLY miscast as Carrie. Wow. She plays the part of a hapless, hopeless, helpless victim about as well as Tom Cruise could play the part of Andre the Giant.
Stephen King gets around the biggest problem of the narrative of Carrie by popping in flashbacks, court testimonials, newspaper articles, etc from the days, weeks, months, etc after the prom that don't explicitly state what happened, but that tell us something BAD (and significant in scale) will happen before all is said and done.
De Palma not only went with the straightforward, chronological approach, he also dropped everything with Carrie learning to use her powers through the course of the story and we wound up with a film that seemed to be going nowhere until the very end.
The remake doesn't fare much better there. Sure, we get Carrie learning to use her powers, but unless you already know the Carrie story (and the movie BANKS on that), then it's still just as bland and plodding as the original until Chris and Billy get the pig blood.
Pointless in the extreme, boring, and aside from two characters (Margaret and Billy) rather miscast, this one is a DUD.