by Benjamin Haines » Tue Jan 03, 2017 2:06 am
I recently rewatched Captain America: Civil War on Netflix. I liked the movie in the theater but I was a little disappointed because I thought it wasn't quite as good as Captain America: The Winter Soldier. That is my favorite MCU entry to date and I guess I was hoping that directors Joe and Anthony Russo would improve on their initial installment in the same way that Bryan Singer did with X2, Guillermo Del Toro did with Hellboy II, and Christopher Nolan did with The Dark Knight. By that measure I was disappointed because, as good as Civil War is, it's a bit more flawed than The Winter Soldier.
I think Avengers: Age of Ultron is more ambitious than The Avengers, for better and for worse, meaning that it hits higher highs but also lower lows in the process of telling a vastly more expansive story with more characters. I think Civil War had a similar result in comparison to The Winter Soldier and that really is the standard by which it comes up the shortest. Taken on its own, Civil War is a terrifically well done action movie, one of the better MCU entries and definitely on the higher end for the comic book film genre.
The movie doesn't play like Avengers 2.5 at all. The role of the Avengers in the story is along the same lines as the role of SHIELD in The Winter Soldier. It's the team of which Cap is a member at the story's outset; they take down villains together until unexpected circumstances drive a wedge between Cap's side and the rest of the team. The plot does follow those same broad strokes as The Winter Soldier, but whereas that movie used the premise as a backdrop for a good/evil conflict (Team Cap good, HYDRA evil), Civil War deftly turns it into a conflict among heroes by having the Avengers be the fractured team in question.
I'm really impressed with how skillfully the Russos and writers Christopher Markus and Stephen McFeely managed to juggle the various characters and subplots of the story. The motivations that drive Cap and Stark are multi-layered and skillfully articulated. The entire premise for this MCU take on Civil War works brilliantly because it takes advantage of all the world-building that's been done up to this point. It's crazy to think that this movie opened just eight years after the original Iron Man. The MCU has really come a long way since then.
I think the biggest flaw in Civil War is that, with so many characters and subplots, a couple of them aren't integrated into the proceedings very organically, specifically Spider-Man and Hawkeye. I understand why Spider-Man feels shoehorned in (because he was, as soon as they worked out the rights and cast Tom Holland) but it just feels jarring to have his first appearance in the story and thus the entire MCU occur past the halfway mark in this nearly 2.5-hour movie. The scene where Stark recruits Parker is amusing to be sure but it literally feels like the movie has exited off the highway to pick up Spider-Man at a rest stop. Then the very next scene returns us to the Scarlet Witch & Vision subplot at Avengers HQ and suddenly Hawkeye arrives. His appearance this late in the film really does feel perfunctory, like it's time for the action to ramp up in the second act and he's just popping up to fill out the ranks because he's a pre-established character.
Oddly enough, even though Ant-Man shows up later in the story than both of those characters, I think his role works as is. Between his "audition" with the Falcon in the previous film and his admiration of Captain America, it works as comic relief for Cap's team to collect him in a van when they're in a bind and have him just be on their team from that point. I do think the film would have benefited from introducing Spider-Man and Hawkeye earlier on, even if it was just one fleeting scene apiece to lay the groundwork for their later appearances. Show Stark in one of the early scenes at Avengers HQ or in Berlin watching that YouTube video of Spider-Man on his smartphone, so there's at least some foundation for when he shows that video to Parker later. Likewise, when Black Widow and Cap are talking about the Accords in London, she mentions that Hawkeye insists he's retired. I think it would have helped if they had a prior scene of Nat discussing this with Clint over the phone via video chat just like they did at the end of Avengers: Age of Ultron, so that Hawkeye's appearance would have felt more natural later on.
That really is my biggest complaint with Captain America: Civil War and why I don't find it to be quite as good as The Winter Soldier. It juggles more characters than its predecessor and mostly does a great job at it but does end up a bit more flawed as a result. Unfortunately, that does make me a little worried about Avengers: Infinity War. If this creative team really does produce better work with fewer characters and a (relatively) smaller-scale story, then that may not bode well for a movie that will presumably have even more characters and a more intricate story. I don't think they'll make a bad film but I'm already checking my expectations and not expecting it to be as good as The Winter Soldier or even Civil War.
