by John Schuermann » Mon May 19, 2014 3:29 pm
To be clear, I am perfectly ok with a Godzilla as hero film. If that was the way they wanted to go, great, I just think it would have been better then if Godzilla was the focus of the film once he showed up, or at least during the final battle where you had a real emotional stake in the outcome (like the Rocky Balboa analogy I posted earlier). I still was able to enjoy the film for what it was, I just would have preferred the smarter, more philosophical film I had already made in my mind based upon what I had seen.
To me, the Godzilla series has always had a problem with tone whenever it tries to be both philosophical while delivering the monster vs. monster goods at the same time. That really is a conflict that I think did in most of the Heisei series. This new film struggles with some of the same thing. If you go all out dark and subtextual like the original 1954 film, then such things as outlandish monster vs. monster battles start seeming more and more ridiculous and laughable. If, on the other hand, you go light and character based like the Sekizawa 60s efforts, it can all be enjoyed for the good lighthearted time that it is.
I thought this film had the potential to be able to tie the monster battle stuff with the philosophical element for the first time ever, in that all of the creatures could be tied together within the bounds of an anti-nuclear theme. Instead, all of the nuclear stuff is more treated like a plot point rather than anything any of the characters really struggle with.
Again, I just so wanted this movie to be smarter than it was. And if they weren't going to go that route, I would have been happy if it had more of the fun light-hearted tone of the Sekizawa efforts, or something like The Avengers or the Raimi Spiderman films.