by Benjamin Haines » Mon Jan 06, 2014 5:03 pm
When I bought Criterion's 2-disc Godzilla DVD, it was the fourth copy of the Japanese version and the fifth copy of Godzilla: King of the Monsters that I owned and it was worth every penny. Both versions of the film have seriously never looked better on any home media release. It's such a joy seeing this stunning black-and-white photography so lovingly restored, devoid of the excess print damage that had plagued other releases over the years while still retaining the grain and texture that is natural of a film made in 1954. Positively gorgeous!
And the presentation of the film is just the start. In addition to a pair of commentaries by David Kalat, there are over two hours of bonus features on these discs. We've got interviews with Akira Takarada, Haruo Nakajima, the late Akira Ifukube (taken from Toho's Japanese DVD release), Tadao Sato, as well as Yoshio Irie and Eizo Kaimai. Every one of these pieces is an absolute treat full of information and insight for us fans to pore over. I would have happily paid for a DVD of these interviews alone and they make this Godzilla release from Criterion one hell of a package.
One of my favorite things about Criterion's release compared to the Classic Media DVD from 2006 is the presentation of the subtitles. CM's subtitles were a garish yellow, requiring me to turn down the color on my TV, and the font they used was so stilted-looking that it made every instance of the lowercase letters 'lo' mash together and look like a lowercase letter 'b' which was frequently distracting. Criterion's subtitles are a plain white color to complement the film and presented in an easily readable font. Major props to them for getting that crucial component of the viewing experience right.
All that being said, I was and continue to be utterly baffled as to why they used a photo of the Kiryugoji Godzilla suit from Godzilla Against Mechagodzilla (2002) for the pop-up image in the interior packaging. It doesn't upset me and I'm not crying foul about it, I just think it's really, really weird that they did that. It's not so much the usage of the 2002 suit's image itself that I find puzzling, it's the fact that Criterion were the ones that did it and I can't imagine WHY they did. If this had happened on a release from Goodtimes or Sony or some other company that just puts out products for profit without much of a second thought, I would just chalk it up to negligence/ignorance on their part. But an esteemed and prestigious company like Criterion? Considering how much effort they clearly put into the film restoration and disc contents for this release, I don't believe for a second that the people involved were oblivious to the fact that they were using a photograph of a Godzilla suit made in 2002 and not the suit featured in the movie they were releasing. Then whenever anybody asked Criterion why they used that suit's photo through online platforms such as Facebook, they always either gave a wordy answer that avoided addressing the question itself or ignored the query altogether. That just raises even more questions! They chose to use a photo of the Kiryugoji suit in the packaging for G'54 and then they consciously avoided even acknowledging that they did that. Not "we used that suit because we thought it looked cool" or "we used that suit because Toho made us," just total silence, which suggests that the reason they used it is something they don't want people to know about, but what kind of reason could that possibly be? It's just so bizarre.
In any case, Criterion's Godzilla release is fantastic all-around and I can't recommend it enough. It's the definitive presentation of both versions of the film so I'll almost certainly be passing on Classic Media's upcoming re-release of King of the Monsters unless they load it up with some unlikely bonus content.
