by canofhumdingers » Sat Oct 12, 2013 1:37 am
Totally agree. This wasn't a film, this was an epic experience. And, yes, you HAVE to see it in 3D. It is a required part of the experience, IMO. And I'm definitely not one to normally advocate for 3D at all. But seeing this film without 3D would be like watching Star Wars as a silent film.
And jelly, living in Space City now, you've got to see this and see it properly!
And, for what it's worth, the 3D in this blew me away. Better than any 3d I've ever seen. I don't know if it's because there was something different about it or just because it was used so well. If 3D was reserved for projects that really benefitted from it like this movie, and then done as well and effectively as it was here, then I'd absolutely change my tune and fully endorse it as a viable part of cinema.
As for the science, there were really only two things that jumped out at me as totally impossible, but they still didn't ruin it for me.