by CyHunter » Wed Oct 15, 2003 8:12 pm
Again, Ang, I'm not sure why you're rubbing it in--I can only tell you so many times that G2 and G3 are indeed 1,000 times better than GvsSG. Since you don't seem to get it, I'll tell you again, in caps for added effect:
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
G2 AND G3 ARE 1,000 TIMES BETTER THAN GvsSG
That having been said, that doesn't mean I'm not going to point out what IMO is the unsung virtue in GvsSG and the scripting/pacing problems in G2 and G3.