by planetxleader » Tue Apr 22, 2014 11:46 am
I can't believe we're actually having a debate about practical effects being a drag on modern movies. Like, really?
Of all the things you could trash Nolan's films for, that's the one thing that I think is safe. It made seeing a plane free-fall hundreds of feet or a tractor trailer flipping over all the more thrilling, and they would have looked awful in CG (I honestly wished they would have done the same with the helicopter crashing in the streets of Gotham in TDK... looked hokey to me, and all I could think of was how better the helicopter pursuit scene in Terminator 2 was by comparison).
As far as urban destruction goes, there is a weird pleasure I attain from seeing the controlled, physical chaos of flying debris and crumbling architecture, something that just looks flat if it's all CG or composited. It's why the ending fight of Godzilla 2000 gets me so hard.
Don't forget GINO, and hell, even Transformers had tons of practical effects in them.
"Vishnu takes on his multi-armed form, and says, "RAAAAAHHHOOO!!!'"