by Hybrid Gojira » Sun May 18, 2014 11:03 pm
I gotta say, I found Steve Ryfle's review outright maddening. He is so off kilter with his comments that they deserve an honest discussion.
He starts off by stating America is incapable of making an "Honest" Godzilla movie; I suppose history would show us that this is true to an extent because of 1998 and the drastic changes that many of the films endured when they were released here. Still, I question his review when he blatantly faults it for being historically inaccurate with regards to the depiction of nuclear testing, quoting his review -
"And what of the hundreds of tests performed by the Soviets, British, French, and Chinese during this period? Would the filmmakers have us believe they were trying to kill their own Godzillas?"
The movie itself makes no claims as to what other world super powers were doing with their bombs; he got off on the wrong foot when he starting questioning the historical accuracy of a Godzilla film. This is a movie, not a work of non-fiction or a documentary.
He faults the movie for not taking a stance on the nuclear issue, but I have to wonder if he is as harsh on every Godzilla film that followed Gojira since none of them feature the same kind of punch when they broach the atomic issue. Consider that the original Godzilla had clear imagery that has largely never been replicated - a city is shown completely annihilated; a mother and son live out what we can only assume are their final moments as a raging fire prepares to engulf them; Godzilla peers over a building and indiscriminately blasts a vehicle with his atomic beam; Godzilla tramples a train, crushing people within; a hospital is depicted with people in agony, including burn victims. While some of the Godzilla movies have fragments of these things, none capture it as the original did. Instead, Godzilla often fights aliens, battles a giant spider, travels in space, has a son, falls in love with a human, befriends a robot who can instantly grow 50 meters, and of course learns to fly.
On some level, Ryfle forgets that this is a movie for entertainment and not an indictment on the American bombs that were dropped on Japan. He makes no bones about throwing accusations awry, insulting anyone who might have a political leaning to the "right" and outright states that America is 100% culpable in the atomic bomb. While that issue has been debated, he makes very candid accusations without providing as so much as one reference as proof. I should think that all of us have opinions on this matter - if I were publishing something to such a degree I would certainly HOPE that I could also back this up with evidence. I'm sure that he can, but he chooses not to in this review.
He also never mentions any horrors committed on the Japanese side, which is convenient for his argument. War is a terrible, ugly thing. I am sure many people here could invoke issues with governments local and abroad for things they have done, but I have to wonder why he cannot present both sides of this. Instead we are to believe this new Godzilla movie is the "OH GODZILLA! WHAT TERRIBLE LANGUAGE!" child of inept film making and a lack of respect for the original character and story, which I find completely and unequivocally false. This a movie, one which tried to pay homage to the source material while bringing about entertainment. I cannot believe that Legendary's Godzilla, which referenced 1954, Mothra (at least twice), Gojira (name of a boat), and tied a nuclear origin to Godzilla is a slap in the face of Gojira. His biggest issue in the film is that it does not do what the original Gojira does and become a continued mantra against the bombing of Japan.
He was simply expecting the wrong thing; therefore, I'd have to conclude he would of course not like this movie.