by Jorzilla » Mon Jul 07, 2014 7:27 pm
Triple Post.
1. If you are fine with Godzilla not having a nuclear allegory, that's fine. I can be okay with that too, and it's like that in a lot of films.
2. I think it's pretty indefensible to say that Godzilla (as a character) in the film has strong nuclear relevance, especially compared to the heavy handiness of the MUTOs nuclear messaging.
3. If you are going to make a movie that has such a strong anti nuclear bent, and honestly, it's stronger than this nature restoring balance message, and you don't make it about Godzilla, I'm going to take issue with it. If you are then going to make Godzilla strive to destroy monsters that incorporate elements of the original messaging to such a strong level, it's going to seriously knock down this fim's credibility.
Seriously, in the almost 2 months since this movie has come out, it went from a #6 on my favorites lists for most complaints levied against the film to a #10 or #11 slot simply based on this artistic decision.