by GaryT » Mon May 24, 2010 1:54 pm
I listened to the commentary over the weekend and found it to be very informative and entertaining. A suggestion or two for future commentaries: (1) You might want to steer clear of doing "funny voices"; it's not your strong suit (2) You might want to take a few seconds at the end of the commentary to thank/acknowledge people who helped you and researchers whose work you are referencing. You dedicate the commentary to Guy Tucker, but a casual listener might be excused if they walked away from the commentary thinking that it was based 100% on research you yourself did, with no help from anybody. (The booklet, in which you are credited EIGHT TIMES--surely some sort of record--would reinforce that impression.)