by Goji 84 » Wed Dec 28, 2011 3:40 pm
Some grain is inherent to all film, and like it was previously mentioned by somebody, PREDATOR used a certain film stock that just happened to be particularly grainy. It doesn't matter to me, because it adds to the film, has always looked that way on any format, and was always meant to look that way to begin with. Have you seen Cameron's restoration of ALIENS? There is still some grain, because it's part of the look of the film. The director himself kept it in tact, so what does that tell you? I cringe at the thought of ALIENS ever looking at horrid as that PREDATOR disk..luckily that will never happen.
JAWS (and GOJIRA) will be keeping the grain in tact because that's (gasp!) as close to what the film would likely look like in 35mm to begin with, and it keeps the integrity of the image, and was meant to look that way by the director/cinematographer. I've seen JAWS in that format, and it's gorgeous. If the BD would be "made to look like it was filmed yesterday", then it would look like complete ass, just like the horrendous PREDATOR disk that you're relentlessly trying to defend.
Unless it was filmed digitally, films should never look as crisp as something like, say, THE DARK KNIGHT. The 2010 PREDATOR disk is one of the worst BD's of a major genre film on the market, if not THE worst. Period.