Page 1 of 1

Blair Witch

PostPosted: Sat Jul 23, 2016 12:07 pm
by XvGojira


So it looks like the movie "The Woods" was just a cover name for Blair Witch 3.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 6:03 am
by Dai
Attack of the Can't See What's Happening.

If ever there was a movie that didn't need sequels or remakes, it's Blair Witch. It was a nicely self-contained little artifact. Then again, my complete lack of enthusiasm for this might stem from the terrible music and editing in that trailer. Seriously, there's a time and a place for the BOWWWWWWs and the BRAAAAAAHMs, and this was not it.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 3:08 pm
by jellydonut25
Adam Wingard is doing this. That's all I need to know.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:44 pm
by lhb412
Did 10 Cloverfield Lane set a precedent for surprise, pop-up franchise flicks?

I suppose when it's low budget enough you can keep a lid on it. It'd be impossible to do a pop-up Superman movie or some such.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:48 pm
by jellydonut25

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:17 am
by DannyBeane
This movie looks like crap, just like the original Blair Witch.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:29 am
by tbeasley
I might be tempted to check this out because I love the original, but there's so much going on in that trailer it's ridiculous.
What made the original so creepy was the simplicity of it. In fact it becomes even creepier to me just thinking there's nothing paranormal going on at all, they're just lost in the woods being pursued and tormented by backwoods hicks.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:10 am
by klen7
It does look more like Blair Witch than Blair Witch 2: Book of Shadows.

Re: Blair Witch

PostPosted: Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:01 pm
by jellydonut25