by Mac » Sun Oct 26, 2008 10:56 pm
I can see why the fanboys hate it, because it's actually Burton's own take (Unlike much of the mediocre first) on Batman.
The first one is more bang-for-the-buck and it has Nicholson and all that pizazz, but it's pretty half-assed as far as storytelling is concerned and you feel Tim Burton's personality wrestling with the commercial requirements of the picture.
Batman Returns works on an almost mythic level, with character traits exaggerated to the point of being almost ridiculous. I mean look at the first shot of Bruce Wayne, he's just sat in the dark, waiting for "OH GODZILLA! WHAT TERRIBLE LANGUAGE!" to go down so he can bat up and beat people down.
It's not a comic book accurate Penguin or Catwoman film, but it's most decidedly a Batman film as both characters, and Schreck, have been warped to be dark, fractured reflections of Batman, the orphan freak, the costumed avenger, and the billionaire philanthropist. And the fact that they all try to kill each other at various times is part of the fun and says something about the character.
I won't argue that much of the plot is a mess and takes quite a few leaps in logic. That's true. But the final confrontations strike me as character driven payoffs to everything that's happened before. Burton made an artsy, psychological, expressionistic Batman film.
Oh, and Danny Elfman's score is amazing, way better than the first.
EDIT: I still flip-flop on which super-hero movie I enjoy the most, Batman Returns or The Dark Knight.