by lhb412 » Thu Jan 04, 2018 12:14 am
Several weeks in, so I'm not SPOILER tagging anything, okay? -
I really liked The Last Jedi, a fact I'm even more enthusiastic about after a second viewing. It makes The Force Awakens (a retread, albeit one with likable new characters) and Rogue One (a side-story predicated on already being invested in a plot point) feel like preludes to this: a movie that feels in every way like a Star Wars movie but is a new movie. After seeing The Last Jedi I'm much more confident in the continuation of this franchise, and, while I'm certainly invested in seeing this trilogy capped off I'm even more interested in seeing what Rian Johnson has in store next.
It provided much needed context and nuance to the SW franchise, namely by touching on the concept of why rebel and what are the social conditions that make rebelling an option? is the force accessible to all and did the Jedi really kinda suck at their jobs? In a series all about hair-brained schemes with one-in-a-million odds leading to victory we have a movie where those schemes screw up and even if successful they may carry too high a cost (this was like that Zatoichi movie - I can't remember which one - where some of Ichi's usual cons and trademark moves backfire on him. It was so refreshing to see the things that always work not work!). In addition, we're taught that while flashy heroics have their place sometimes there's value in prudence, in caution. Indeed, these values are represented by the conflict between Poe and Holdo and yet it is Holdo, not hotshot Poe, who executes the craziest Hail Mary save of all in one of the coolest scenes! In solid narrative fashion, of course, Poe behaves prudently in the finale.
Listen, I know art is subjective and all that and I can't fault anybody for just not liking a movie, but some common complaints for TLJ are just nonsense. People complain that Finn/Rose/Poe's hair-brained scheme didn't work proves that it was a useless part of the movie that should have been excised from the plot. Wha? The fact that it doesn't work and screws everything up is the plot! It's important for the running theme of failure. Luke thought he was a failure and not a great Jedi but needed Yoda to teach him that he was both, and that we must learn from failure. Even the greatest among us fail! It's just reality! In the end Luke weaponizes his own legend to save the rebellion/resistance, embarrass the First Order/Kylo, and inspire a new generation - all while merely using his spiritual power and simple strategy. That was far cooler than making Luke's character some uber-badass (and not giving Hamill a role meaty enough for his talents).
Holdo is at fault for not letting in Poe and certain other characters in on the ultimate plan? It's because she doesn't trust them! I mean, you can complain about her behavior, say she's wrong, but to say the movie doesn't give a reason is rather obtuse.
People have complained about the Casino Planet's look... and I don't know what to say about that. It's just the glossy version of stuff we've already seen in Lucas' movies. As a matter of fact, it seems almost like a setting from the prequels, only, in my opinion, more nicely realized (come on, that set and costume are nicely designed!).
And to top it all off: thrilling action! The fight in Snoke's throne room was the best lightsaber fight in the history of SW! The ship-to-ship battles were well thought out, with good scene geography and very visually distinct sides, making them engaging and easy to follow.
Oh, also: great scene transitions between the various subplots and groups of characters. We're always reminded of that character or plot in the scene we're watching right before the transition. A simple but satisfying trick that makes things go so much easier (Luc Besson does something similar in The Fifth Element, but gets more playful with it - cutting between characters in different locations having variations on the same conversations and the like).